Barton Sease: yes he better than hulk hogan
Porfirio Cahall: no
Lady Laflin: I like both but I'm more of an Attitude era guy so i have to go with Austin.
Georgina Natal: Yes
Armando Somes: Depends on what you want out of a show. If you were a wrestling fan who watched wrestling shows to see wrestlers wrestle, then the Attitude Era was the worst thing that could happen. They didn't wrestle in the Attitude Era.But if you're a fan of R-rated action movies where they just bleed and use weapons, destroy things, drink and cuss a lot, then the Attitude Era was great.The Attitude Era had it's entertaining bits, but it wasn't wrestling. They just bled, used weapons, destroyed things, and cussed a lot. That ain't wrestling.I'm a wrestling fan. I watch wrestling to see wrestlers wrestle. They did that in Hogan's "Golden Age" era. I wasn't a big Hulk Hogan fan, and I didn't much care for the superman running around slaying bad guys all the time, but alt! hough Hogan was THE star, there was much more to it than just Hogan trouncing the bad guys. They wrestled in those days. I liked that.They quit wrestling in the Attitude Era to do things that were shocking just to be shocking, cussing just to cuss, bleeding just to bleed. Most of it was just to push the censors as far as they could to get young adults who weren't wrestling fans to watch the shows. The Attitude Era was not wrestling. I didn't like it....Show more
Keven Drumgole: OH HELL YEAH!
Teodoro Lamond: Have to agree, but I do go back to Hogan's era..and Hogan's character was quite appealing to the fan base in it's time..BQ: AGREE, but that is only because the WWE is a public company and is currently seeking to curry favor with advertisers who don't want to associate itself with R Rated programming such as the way it was during the 'Attitude Era'....Show more
Raul Tllo: I liked them both now it is just one be Soap Opera for men.
Oren Eskelse! n: Yes. Hogan's era sucked, Austin's was incredible, and Super! Cena's is the worst.
No comments:
Post a Comment